Відео

If we man kind behave the way most animals that are doing God's will, we wouldn't be dealings with this nonsense. Homosexuality is the recipe ones people destruction. Xesualiry is a gift from God to multiply! it is a simple as that!

The bible does not say "by Faith Alone."

Trent is a joke. He's definitely not saved. The CIA sure knows how to pick em. 😂

There is NO REASON to confess to ANY man, let alone to a man who is called priest. Jesus “ended” the priesthood. He was the last priest. READ for yourself!

I liked the shack. It’s fiction. I don’t get my theology from it. Same way I don’t get my theology from Mark Twains stories.

7:30 "the apostles never once, in the New Testament, acted as if they had the authority to forgive a person's sins." ........ Um, 2nd Corinthians 2:10 >>> "And I forgive anyone.... I do so.... in the person of Christ." ('In Persona Christi')

Bro that first reason is powerful.

I'm a protestant but find myself agreeing with Trent more than with Parr on these issues. 1. There's nothing inherently wrong with venerating saints or asking for the saints to intercede for you. 2. There's absolutely nothing wrong with praying for the dead (we do this regularly). 3. Eucharist is the real presence of Christ, not a symbol. 4/5. We don't have the mortal/venial sin distinction, but we don't teach absolute assurance either. We believe in entire sanctification and purification through the Holy Spirit's work in us. 6. This is an issue with the Baptist view of 'faith alone'. Faith does not just mean a thought or belief, if you have faith in something, you will behave as though it were true. That's not a work of man, it's a work of the Holy Spirit on man. "Only God can get me to Heaven, but you and I can get ourselves to Hell" -- I agree with this statement 100%. Have a blessed day, Trent.

Thank you Trent! God bless you.

Trent, your graphics lookin' clean my man!

I love it

Deam, as an atheist this is really funny.

One issue that comes up in the issue of the early church is that it appears only sins were confessed that had done public element, adultery for example but not every private sinful thought even if they were grave. It’s hard to reconcile that with the later insistence that all mortal sins need to be confessed to a minister. The Didache seems to be referring to the public confession made at the beginning of the liturgy which btw how come that absolution can’t suffice

No

When is Trent going to talk about Pope Joan . She wasnt Pope long because she had a baby and later murdered . Very interesting scandal.

Just keep changing the definition

Trent is so patient.

If God wanted to save everyone why not just save everyone? Or make our nature less innately sinful. God gave us impossible standards and designed us so we couldn't meet them. The game is rigged to make us glorify this god.

So many doctrines of the Catholic Church predate the official canon of the Bible: the church, mass, confession, baptism, etc. I don’t understand why anyone would conclude that sola scriptura is the ultimate authority.

I think that it was quite funny, and interesting.

Either jimmy akin is a better apologist than his opponent but his faith is a false one and his opponent isn’t a very good apologist but his faith is the correct one than that’s the only way you can say the Protestant position is the right one on this issue. What was debated here clearly made jimmy seem the winner. In my humble opinion the Protestant position needs a better justification if it’s to make the catholic position false. Having said all that I do wonder sometimes what the God both sides claim to believe in makes of such nitpicking amongst the faithful. Perhaps the Devil understands that humans do love a nitpick and that’s the basis of his strategy against Christians.

Baptizing and Forgiving Sins are completely different. I can't believe that example is even being compared. 1 John 2:23 is talking about the Trinity. It has NOTHING to do with the directive that people have to confess their sins to other people. When he gives the example of confessing "ὁμολογέω" (homologeō), the word is NOT exclusive to confessing to the public. It is also used in DIRECTLY confessing to GOD. Also, the exception to this word is found in Hebrews 13:15 where it is used for PRAISING. All those other examples of confessing have to do with confessing beliefs, fate, confessing something that is not. That is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than confessing your SINS to GOD. John 20:22-23 is merely saying that you can forgive. Anyone can forgive. ONLY JESUS CAN TAKE AWAY SIN so NO man is given authority nor the power to TAKE AWAY SIN. Read the last part of the verse : "if you retain the sins of any, they are retained." DOES THAT MEAN THAT YOU TAKE ON THE SINS OF OTHERS?? Please! Just stop it!! It's very dangerous how this guy is trying to make scripture fit his narrative. I'll stick to directly praying to the ultimate mediator. JESUS. He is our PRIEST AND KING, OUR WONDERFUL COUNSELOR. I'm not going to substitute HIM with a priest who could be thinking about molesting children while hearing my confessions...

You confess your sin to the person you sinned against. Since all sin is ultimately a sin against God, we can confess to him as well. Yes, it's very important to confess to other humans when they are involved. Your priest is not involved. It's not required to confess to some 3rd party agent like a priest who is neither the harmed party nor God, as they don't receive or forgive your sins and confessions, neither on behalf of God nor on behalf of the offended party you sinned against. RC is always trying to insert mediators when scripture is clear there is only one mediator. Stop trying to "go through" unnecessary mediators.

RR is a wannabe Alex O’Connor

Why will God forgive venial sins without having to go through a Roman Catholic priest?

I'm not a Catholic since I don't practice praying for the dead and praying repetitive prayers using the rosary. But I really admire your passion in spreading God's words without dragging someone into joining the Catholic faith.

Protestant response. Trent you really being generous calling these books “Christian”. The first three books in particular are written by people that most Protestants (and I would think Roman Catholics would agree) consider heretical. I do believe that LaHaye is a Christian but historic Protestantism would part company with him on eschatology.

1Peter2:9 - refers to the “chosen generation” of believers as equaling the “royal priesthood”. One of the strong difficulties with the Catholic interpretation of priest is how a fraternity of clergy priests are segmented from the lay priests. As seriously as the Catholic views confession, the idea that a priest can be banished, permanently, from the segmented fraternity of clergy priests seems to deny Gods ability to forgive and restore. Especially in light of Christs explicit instructions to forgive in Matthew 18:21-22. The severity of that punishment would not be possible, without the segmentation of the priest hood of believers. To that end, it is a spiritual risk not to forgive said priest, lest you yourself not be forgiven (Matthew 6:15). To declare a priest has not been reinstated, at this time, (in sincerity) is one thing, but to declare a priest will never be reinstated, and teach this as a religious requirement universal, seems incredibly scripturally dangerous.

I feel like Mr. Winger knows the truth, but he can't admit it because he'll be out of a job. He knows how to glaze over some points of doctrine that he can't argue, so I think he knows he is wrong.

Simon the magician ask Peter the to pray for him for his sins to be forgiven in Acts 8, after Peter pronounce judgment on him

1 John 1:7 KJV "but if we walk in the LIGHT, as HE is in the LIGHT, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of JESUS CHRIST HIS SON cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we CONFESS our sins, HE (GOD) is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." Romans 14:11 KJV "For it is written, As I live, says the LORD, every knee shall bow to ME, and every tongue shall confess to GOD. 12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to GOD." Note: You confess to GOD in the name of CHRIST and HE it is that cleanses you from all sin not a sinner RCC priest.

The dude just mudslings. Fine. But to say Catholics are anti-science is ignorance; without the foundation Catholics have given in science and math, we'd be far behind.

No true Christian believer took John 6 literally, the all looked at John 6:63 and said oh, it is the Holy Spirit in the Bread and wine. Jesus in us is the Holy Spirit. And Peter said this parable ( we know it is a parable because Jesus always used parables to crowds. 5000 in this crowd.) Is to give Eternal life. ( Holy Spirit) They also believed in a second version without the Holy Spirit in it for the Saved. Last Supper version.

I left the Methodist church and joined the Catholic Church

Over 2000 years, Catholicism gets it right, unlike the 40,000 denominations of protestanism that are still misinterpreting scripture

I love how Joel Olsteen literally non-ironically uses the term "wrong-think" which is some 100% 1984 dystopian nonsense.

Do not be deceived: Men who submit to or perform homosexual acts will NOT inherit the kingdom of God. Satan hates mankind and the truth, satan is strong in this one.

Arguing about minutae when there are bigger problems confronting the church

Jesus tells us to pray to the father and to ask him to forgive our sins. He never tells us to contact a Catholic Priest, confess to him and do penance with x # of Hail Marys.

That just makes me feel like God doesn’t want me to talk directly to Him. Pray through Jesus, pray through Mary, pray through the saints, pray through the priest. This is why I don’t get Christians. How can you feel okay with the idea that you can’t talk to God directly or ask for his forgiveness directly?

The Bible says Jesus is our priest the whole idea of a priesthood is unbiblical in the first place

Or just confess your sins to Christ, as the Orthodox do...and not follow these RC errors.

Protestant here, baptism does not save, it is just a public announcement of what has already occurred. So if a priest cannot save, I still dont understand why I *need* to go to them. If only God saves, why do I need a mediator between me and God? Jesus is my one and only mediator, 1 Timothy 2:5. I can confess my sins to anyone and they to me, we can help eachother. Which verses mention the succession of apostolic authority? A way for the apostles to know whose sins to forgive, without confession, would be divine inspiration. God knows all man's sins and would be able to guide them. I dont see why this is implausible. Your last point at least doesn't say that we have to go to a priest, only that it can be comforting, so is it a choice in Catholicism to confess to a priest or a requirement?

“Righteous person” does not refer to dead people. Jesus is only mediator.

If you pay close attention, Trent is reverentially incoherent. When critiquing contrarian voices, they succumb to arguing from silence. However, when Trent claims that “nowhere in the NT…” he too argues from silence, but somehow his fallacy is somehow valid. The church’s prayer book is the Psalms. David clearly exemplifies acknowledge and confessing sin directly to God without any intermediaries: “I acknowledged my sin to You, And my iniquity I did not hide; I said, “I will confess my transgressions to the LORD”; And you forgave the guilt of my sin” (NASB 32:5). Trent also misses the immediate referent in view when John uses the pronoun “He [Jesus] is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 Jn 1:9). There is no discernible other subject in that passage other than the pronoun which is an undeniable reference to Jesus. If Jesus has authority to forgive sins on earth, as Trent rightly argued, then it seems logically inescapable that you confess sins to whom the transgression was made against. Trent has yet to provide any argument for thinking that it is logically valid to confess sin or offenses to someone other than the offended party. Lastly, everything he says about public confession, and confessing sins to one another is consistent with the aforementioned.

Nah man you can just go directly to Jesus or your boys (I haven’t watched the video)

Have to push back on the critique on the belief meme. I agree with Trent saying " atheism is not a belief" is sloppy and false. Atheism is a belief that a god does not exist. I think many atheist fall into here is they are trying to corner theist by saying, "Atheism is not a belief, but you theist have a positive belief so you have the burden of proof". But atheism is not a SYSTEM of belief. We don't claim we know how the world works. Some atheists are scientific, superstitious, nihilist, stoic. It is not like Christianity where you have a system explaining human nature, origin of the world, communal identity. Also have to push back on the agnostic bit. There is no neutral " I don't know" there is "I don't know but I believe" or "I don't know, but I do not believe". Those two positions put you on the atheist/ theist camps.

Confession to another person yes, and since you are saying a priest is not totally necessary, then yes, a priest is simply another person.

Trent I would love for you to make a video on the minimal formula for the sacrament of confession and what form needs to be said by the priest for the confession to be valid

I already knew Destiny was a demented freak, but damn someone needs to check that dude's hard drive.